Search:

Last 3 Posts @ November 20, 2008 9:59:07 AM EST

Danebury Avenue free-for-all? (3 hrs, 34 mins ago)

I've been trying to get to the bottom of secret Council plans to remove the road barrier at the end of Danebury Avenue by Alton School and Tunworth Crescent. There ...

Stuart King for Putney

Surprise development as Immanuel Kant considered for top advisory post with teaching unions (3 hrs, 53 mins ago)

In response to my recent post on the BNP membership saga, Dave went all pithy on me (have you seen how long his posts are?) and asked a straight albeit rhetorical quest...

The Bickerstaffe Record

Public service announcement (4 hrs, 6 mins ago)

Dadblog

Monday, July 07, 2008

Willful waste - 1 comment

'Stop wasting food', urges Brown. It's a shame people have concentrated on what this means for Britain - supposedly £8 of food being thrown away per week by the average household - rather than on this somewhat more damning statistic:
[...] up to 40% of food harvested in developing countries can be lost before it is consumed, due to the inadequacies of processing, storage and transport.
Not being able to sell their products affects the livelihoods of far more people, who have far less to live on.

It is a little ridiculous for Brown to have to ask people to change their own behaviour in order to save themselves some money. However correct the cause, Governments have to allow individuals to make their own mistakes (to remind them is embarrassing for all concerned), and to address those mistakes themselves by buying less food if the £8 is indeed worth their while saving. Besides, this wastage of food probably helps rather than hinders poor food producers, so I must declare myself neutral on this aspect (read: blind alley) of the global food debate.

*

One thing that immediately struck me when reading the piece, though, was: would the Government have been brave enough to suggest that people might save money by using less petrol, or that by borrowing less they might insulate themselves from rising interest rates? People inevitably realise this and adapt accordingly, but the reaction to a politician stating it would be furious.

*

Returning to food, the Conservatives miss the point as usual:
Shadow environment secretary Peter Ainsworth said government departments should set a better example.
[...] But while the government is telling households to reduce food waste it has no idea how much food it is throwing away itself. This is yet again a clear case of the government saying 'do as we say not as we do'.
Feeble. Meanwhile, Lib Dem environment spokesman, Steve Webb, blames supermarkets:
Supermarkets make it harder for householders to avoid food waste, while throwing away large quantities of edible food through poor stock management. [...]
In this era of long-life food, fridges, and freezers, and with food generally being non-addictive, the only justification for not eating food before the use-by date is either greed, or (in my case) laziness. Please credit the people with some intelligence. As for stock management, supermarkets already pay a penalty for poor decisions, by being unable to sell food they've paid for, and by having to pay for its disposal, something shoppers would otherwise have done. These feel like big enough incentives already.

Labels: , , , , , ,

B4L Running Costs

£2,353.96 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.65 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe


Locations of visitors to this page Politics Blog Top Sites Get your Google PageRank
Check out our Frappr!
Southampton FC
TheyWorkForYou.com