Search:

Last 3 Posts @ September 7, 2008 9:22:40 PM EDT

Wait for it, wait for it... (1 hour, 28 mins ago)

Porridge - still the finest product of British broadcasting. (Discuss)

Never Trust a Hippy

The Monday Cyril: Links to Smith's Hansard Archive (2 hrs ago)

For reference dear readers here are the direct links to Sir Cyril Smith MBE MP's finest parliamentary "contributions". Contributions to asbestos science, health and...

Chris Paul: Labour of Love

Resilience in the face of the great British weather (2 hrs, 5 mins ago)

I never fail to be impressed by the sheer resilience of the people of our wonderful community in the face of the dreadful British weather!  This weekend I had the plea...

Chuka Umunna: Streatham Labour

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Myers-Briggs Types - 1 comment

My employer has had the bright idea of organising a "card game" for everyone in the office, this Thursday evening. Intelligence reaches me that this is almost certainly boils down to a Myers-Briggs test, which is covered here at the Skepdic's Dictionary. See also this drivel.

I'm sure I speak for all B4L readers when I state that I'd really rather not undergo a pseudo-scientific test (if that's quite the right term) of this nature, and so I ask "How do I get out of this?" or, more realistically, "How can I render any results I produce unusable?". Presumably the worst possible situation would be to produce a 'clear' result (insofar as these results can be clear) that wasn't even 'me'.

If anyone has any suggestions or experience, please post them here, as I'm sure it's in the public interest that such testing is challenged.

Labels: , , , ,

B4L Running Costs

£2,114.79 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.18 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe


Locations of visitors to this page Politics Blog Top Sites Get your Google PageRank
Check out our Frappr!
Southampton FC
TheyWorkForYou.com