Search:

Last 3 Posts @ November 20, 2008 11:25:43 AM EST

Danebury Avenue free-for-all? (5 hrs ago)

I've been trying to get to the bottom of secret Council plans to remove the road barrier at the end of Danebury Avenue by Alton School and Tunworth Crescent. There ...

Stuart King for Putney

Surprise development as Immanuel Kant considered for top advisory post with teaching unions (5 hrs, 19 mins ago)

In response to my recent post on the BNP membership saga, Dave went all pithy on me (have you seen how long his posts are?) and asked a straight albeit rhetorical quest...

The Bickerstaffe Record

Public service announcement (5 hrs, 33 mins ago)

Dadblog

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Myers-Briggs Types - 1 comment

My employer has had the bright idea of organising a "card game" for everyone in the office, this Thursday evening. Intelligence reaches me that this is almost certainly boils down to a Myers-Briggs test, which is covered here at the Skepdic's Dictionary. See also this drivel.

I'm sure I speak for all B4L readers when I state that I'd really rather not undergo a pseudo-scientific test (if that's quite the right term) of this nature, and so I ask "How do I get out of this?" or, more realistically, "How can I render any results I produce unusable?". Presumably the worst possible situation would be to produce a 'clear' result (insofar as these results can be clear) that wasn't even 'me'.

If anyone has any suggestions or experience, please post them here, as I'm sure it's in the public interest that such testing is challenged.

Labels: , , , ,

B4L Running Costs

£2,354.15 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.65 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe


Locations of visitors to this page Politics Blog Top Sites Get your Google PageRank
Check out our Frappr!
Southampton FC
TheyWorkForYou.com