Search:

Last 3 Posts @ August 27, 2008 8:30:43 PM EDT

Jerusalem Quartet will perform to full house in Edinburgh (11 mins ago)

Last month I posted about the Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign’s effort to block a performance by the Jerusalem Quartet from Israel at the Edinburgh Intern...

Harry's Place

Find the missing Labour bloggers (20 mins ago)

Back in the early days of B4L, before the Labour blogosphere was fully mapped, I could rely upon a handful of very helpful people to seek out bloggers I hadn't yet com...

Bloggers4Labour

Free speech on the internet - an issue for trade unionists (1 hour, 13 mins ago)

Blogging is fairly new. It may prove useful for trade unionists. When I started blogging it occurred to me that, although I thought what I was doing – in reporting ba...

Jon's union blog

Monday, July 07, 2008

Willful waste - 1 comment

'Stop wasting food', urges Brown. It's a shame people have concentrated on what this means for Britain - supposedly £8 of food being thrown away per week by the average household - rather than on this somewhat more damning statistic:
[...] up to 40% of food harvested in developing countries can be lost before it is consumed, due to the inadequacies of processing, storage and transport.
Not being able to sell their products affects the livelihoods of far more people, who have far less to live on.

It is a little ridiculous for Brown to have to ask people to change their own behaviour in order to save themselves some money. However correct the cause, Governments have to allow individuals to make their own mistakes (to remind them is embarrassing for all concerned), and to address those mistakes themselves by buying less food if the £8 is indeed worth their while saving. Besides, this wastage of food probably helps rather than hinders poor food producers, so I must declare myself neutral on this aspect (read: blind alley) of the global food debate.

*

One thing that immediately struck me when reading the piece, though, was: would the Government have been brave enough to suggest that people might save money by using less petrol, or that by borrowing less they might insulate themselves from rising interest rates? People inevitably realise this and adapt accordingly, but the reaction to a politician stating it would be furious.

*

Returning to food, the Conservatives miss the point as usual:
Shadow environment secretary Peter Ainsworth said government departments should set a better example.
[...] But while the government is telling households to reduce food waste it has no idea how much food it is throwing away itself. This is yet again a clear case of the government saying 'do as we say not as we do'.
Feeble. Meanwhile, Lib Dem environment spokesman, Steve Webb, blames supermarkets:
Supermarkets make it harder for householders to avoid food waste, while throwing away large quantities of edible food through poor stock management. [...]
In this era of long-life food, fridges, and freezers, and with food generally being non-addictive, the only justification for not eating food before the use-by date is either greed, or (in my case) laziness. Please credit the people with some intelligence. As for stock management, supermarkets already pay a penalty for poor decisions, by being unable to sell food they've paid for, and by having to pay for its disposal, something shoppers would otherwise have done. These feel like big enough incentives already.

Labels: , , , , , ,

1 comment so far...

At 9:09 AM, July 08, 2008, Blogger Bishop Hill said...

This is a thoughtful post, and I like the emphasis on the truly poor in developing countries.

I would however take issue with your suggestion that the food waste in the third world is due to developed world markets being closed.

It is highly unlikely that surplus food is being produced with a view to selling it on a market which is closed. The waste is occurring because people in developing countries don't have access to the advanced packaging technologies and refrigeration that prevent food spoilage in developed countries.

Also worth noting that our political masters, in their infinite wisdom, are doing everything they can to eliminate this packaging from food in this country. The net effect of this is likely to be that food wastage increases in this country.

   

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£2,078.91 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.11 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe