Preparing for Opposition - 3 comments
It's very strange to read things like this: "The strange death of Labour Britain", full of statements like:
[...] To which one dissident mordantly replies: "there is no element of risk to keeping Gordon, the outcome is certain. It is disaster".Who are these people? An MBE for the first political journalist who, the day before their retirement, scans and uploads their little black book, naming every source, dissident, 'still ambitious cabinet minister', 'One Labour MP', and so on.
*
The idea that the Labour Government believes itself to be already defeated is a bizarre one: if MPs and Cabinet Ministers don't believe they can challenge Cameron and the Tories, they had better believe that Labour activists and supporters are more confident.
The key thing, though, is that within two years an Election Manifesto needs to be drawn up, in which the political side of the Labour movement makes its case to the electorate. While there might still be those who believe Labour can 'flop' over the line in 2009/10 on their current record, that's hardly an edifying prospect at the best of times, and offers nothing for the 5 years of opposition if Labour do lose. Governments have to be truly appalling for Oppositions to be able to play on their prior record (e.g. Labour, 1979-1981?): a fresh slate is usually required. And given the muddle the Government currently seems to be in, now seems to be the ideal time to wipe that slate, write that document, and then relaunch. There's no shame in that. It would also focus media interest.
It won't be easy. When you have factions that take the view: "You were wrong, therefore we must have been right" (not A therefore Q), the process of coming to terms with what went wrong, what was learned, what can be changed, etc. is undermined by those who believe the solution is to reject policies utterly, in favour of their black-for-white opposites. It requires people with open minds. Surely better, also, that the ideological debate happens now, so at least something decent can be produced in time for the next General Election, than we have a fruitless appeal to 'loyalty' that forces us to take the 'one last flop' approach, and renders a Labour opposition irrelevant up until the next mid-term.









![Validate my Atom feed [Valid Atom]](http://www.bloggers4labour.org/images/valid-atom.png)






3 comments so far...
Gordon Brown is a disaster.
The ONLY thing he has acheived for Labour in the last 18 months is to highlight just how good Tony Blair was.
For TB to have held this party together, and in government, for 10years, and with GB obviously having been nothing more than a thorn in his side. There can be no better tribute to the Ex-PM.
Come back Tony.. PLease!
I would have thought it was clear enough that the Government are failing - I think that a move back to social democratic values and policies is necessary. No more worship of the market. No more new labour. A temporary failed experiment which appeared to succeed in the absence of opposition
If the public was demanding social democratic values and policies, why are they switching to the Tories?
We should never simply "revert" to earlier policies: we should learn the lessons of the past and produce policies that work, and/or that move us towards the kind of society people want. Labour activists cannot turn back the clock to 1994 (or earlier) and pretend that the completely untested programme of those days *must* have been superior to a subsequent one that had to withstand 14 years of events, crises, new evidence, demographic changes, Ministerial changes, etc.
Nobody should be feeling smug here: make the programme as socialist as you like (subject to the need to win an election) but don't just "move back".
Post a Comment
<< Home