Rating Peace - 1 comment
You could read this, from the Economist: Give peace a rating: An index of pacifism. Nice try, but rather misses the point.
Alternatively, you could read Norm's 2007 Manchester Peace Lecture, a slightly amended version of which was presented at the Euston Manifesto conference:
From what I've said here I think it's clear enough that our world is still a very long way from those conditions of peace spelled out 30 years ago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn: that the limits of state violence be set at the threshold where the need to defend society's members ceases; that we outlaw from the human condition the very idea that some are permitted to use violence regardless of justice, law and mutual agreements.
Where there is state lawlessness there is no peace, and the victims of such lawlessness are entitled to seek what help or escape they may, and others to provide it. That is why the tasks of a global peace movement go beyond the prevention of aggressive war.
Labels: Euston Manifesto, justice, peace, war










![Validate my Atom feed [Valid Atom]](http://www.bloggers4labour.org/images/valid-atom.png)






1 comment so far...
I see reflections here of what Malcolm Muggeridge related in a 1939 article entitled "What Government by Terror really means". At that time, Terrorism had a different interpretation, one of a doctrine inculcated by a state upon its people by means of terror.
I agree with what's being said about Peace, as an advocate for targeted microeconomic investment. For us as a small social enterprise this began in 1996 by pitching the concept at President Clinton in a whitepaper for poverty eradication. Since then we have proposed such a program in Russia achieving full cost recovery over 5 years and succeeding where the Defense Enterprise Fund had floundered.
For the past 3 years, we've been engaged in Ukraine, finally persuading their government to forward what amounts to a social "Marshall Plan" as the outline strategy for their MCC Compact with US government.
Government is our main obstruction, ours not their. Departments who don't pay their invoices, politicians who won't reply to letters at their Commons addresses and total inaccessibility to the relevant APPG to name but a few of the issues. We can talk about these things endlessly but I really would like to see some indication that our Labour Party "walks the walk" when it comes to making it a reality.
Jeff Mowatt
http://www.p-ced.com/
Post a Comment
<< Home