Search:

Last 3 Posts @ July 25, 2008 10:29:52 AM EDT

I-raq and roll (14 mins ago)

An American soldier friend let me listen to some of his pro-war music last night and one track that stuck in my head was Clint Black’s “I-raq and Roll,R...

Though Cowards Flinch

Survey Highlights Ailing Local Healthcare (19 mins ago)

On 5th July, as you're probably aware, the NHS celebrated its 60th anniversary. We marked the day by carrying out a local consultation to find out people’s views abou...

Andy Love MP

Mercury thoughts (28 mins ago)

Anna tasked has recently updated us on her busy life and mentioned the Mercury nominations. Hmm... Adele - 19 British Sea Power - Do You Like Rock Music? Buria...

Rullsenberg Rules

Friday, March 23, 2007

Blog Costs - 2 comments

David Miliband has gone into more detail on the costs of running his Defra blog, but it's short enough to quote in its entirety:
Contrary to the repeated falsehood that this blog costs £40,000, here are the facts. The initial start up cost of the blog at ODPM was £6,000. The changeover to Defra cost £1,250 and ongoing technical costs amount to £900 pa. Since I write my own blogs, read comments, and don't have a shadow blogger the admin costs are low: one valiant official spends part of his time posting blogs and comments. It is estimated that this takes around 10 hours per month at an estimated cost of £300.
This is public money, so it's David's responsibility to make it as useful and revealing a resource as he can, but as regards the costs, these sound completely reasonable and not at all extravagant. Suppose you were commissioning a branded blogging system for your organisation, designed and laid-out, and backed by a suitable database: would you object to paying for development, installation, and testing that equates to, what, 10 man-days at a UK-based web development company? Annual running costs are also, without going into too much detail, not a million miles from what is paid for this site.

P.S. There is a Budget-oriented post coming - maybe later today?

Labels: , ,

2 comments so far...

At 3:19 PM, March 27, 2007, Blogger Angry Steve said...

And no comment on the party political post he made (and later retracted) using public money?

   
At 7:55 PM, March 27, 2007, Blogger Bloggers4Labour said...

It's a bit hard to comment given that he was forced to modify it, though what remained - especially given his familiarity with the rules - didn't hint at the original being very controversial.

Of course, if it weren't for party policies he wouldn't be a politician, he wouldn't be a Minister, and ministerial policy would have to be set by someone else (who?). You can't allow Ministers to use public funds overtly for a particular party's benefit; all the same, the idea that you can detach that Minister from party politics is incredible, rules or no rules.

   

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£1,970.27 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £3.89 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe