Search:

Last 3 Posts @ October 6, 2008 5:27:02 PM EDT

John Redwood says David Cameron is suffering from “a new kind of madness” (4 mins ago)

In an extraordinary outburst against the policy being advocated by his own party leader, John Redwood has described the suggestion that the state should seek to recapi...

Conservative and Unionist

Liverpool Young Writers 08/09 – Now recruiting! (28 mins ago)

Information from an email from Writing on the Wall An innovative local project for Merseyside's budding young writers, poets, M.C.s and performers begins this month....

Louise Baldock

What the f*ck (37 mins ago)

Now it is true that I have been known to overdo the use of 'foul language' but in the circumstances it seems only possible to paraphrase Richard Mottram We're all f*ck...

arbitrary constant

Monday, November 20, 2006

Recent Posts changes - 2 comments

I can recall the days when our Recent Posts page wouldn't show more than 50 or so posts from the two preceding days' posting. Today is actually fairly quiet with a mere 266, but the total has been as high as (a remarkable) 430 in the last fortnight. That's a lot.

Not only does that slow down the loading of the page, it also makes reading through the posts more frightening a prospect than it should be, as well as being rather costly in the use of our bandwidth.

So, from this day forth the page now displays posts in bunches of 100, which should still keep you going for a while. You can move from one group to the next using the links at the top and bottom of the page. You'll quickly see that you can also change the URL to display a different number of posts to 100 (please don't try typing "-999", as nothing funny will happen), but I don't plan to make that configurable unless there's demand for it.

One other thing: bear in mind that because it's quite likely that more posts will have been published in the time it takes you to work through one bunch of 100, a post that appears at the foot of one "page" may also appear on the next one you visit, simply because it's been pushed down by new posts further up. Of course this could be solved in a nice way, but hopefully it's acceptable (and makes some sense) for the time being.

So, do you approve of the changes, or was it really perfect just as it was?

2 comments so far...

At 6:49 PM, November 21, 2006, Blogger Neil Harding said...

Good improvement I think.

   
At 5:20 PM, November 30, 2006, Blogger John said...

deffo approve - and could well go even further mebbe (latest 50, plus removing some of the other page furniture for this one - eg blogroll)?
Declared interest: I read the page on my mobile and downloading such a huge page eats up my data charges!
cheers, John

   

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£2,208.54 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.36 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe