Search:

Last 3 Posts @ August 8, 2008 3:10:56 PM EDT

God or evolution? (6 mins ago)

Justin Thacker, a doctor of theology, has been arguing over at Comment is Free why Richard Dawkins is an example of the argumentative overreach of many strident atheis...

Though Cowards Flinch

Rush: Snakes and Arrows (2007). In Praise of a Maligned Band. (15 mins ago)

It’s amazing how the mind works, how something banal can produce a fleeting thought, which then develops by a series of associations to lead you to re discover somethi...

Dermot

Sex, puppies and Mormonism (28 mins ago)

JOURNALISTS say that this is the perfect news headline: Sex-change priest in mercy dash to palace. Not entirely sure if it’s a fantasy headline sort of thin...

And another thing...

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

The Economist - 4 comments

According to the Economist's Pocket World in Figures (2006 Edition) that came through the post today, no fewer than 179% of eligible children in the United Kingdom are enrolled in secondary education (it is a mere 100% in the primary sector). That's an achievement of which we can all be proud.

Perhaps I'd better cross-check other facts with the Wikipedia in future.

Anyway, the book was free, and my new subscription to The Economist gets me the next 12 copies for just £12, which is pretty sweet. How did I swing this incredible deal? I followed one of the Google Ads on this very site, just to prove they're not entirely ridiculous and irrelevant. The licence to carry out humanist weddings may also come in handy - you never know.

There does seem to be a suspicion of economists on our side of the political fence - large parts of it, anyway - but characterising what is, after all, a social science, as something that legitimises greed, promotes privatisation, challenges benevolent governments, is tied to capitalism or Anglo-Saxon values, is insensitive to other cultures, and which is more concerned with calculation rather than human interaction, does the subject a huge disservice.

Ignorance of economics plays into the hands of the Right - it blinds us to liberal, egalitarian policies we could be promoting, to the limits of Government, and to the abuse of the subject by - to name just one group - political enemies who are most concerned with entrenching their own power.

4 comments so far...

At 3:38 PM, June 07, 2006, Blogger El Tom said...

but hang on... I thought we were against poll tax?..

   
At 3:48 PM, June 07, 2006, Blogger Bloggers4Labour said...

We are...

   
At 12:07 PM, June 09, 2006, Blogger Sam said...

Its a far cry from the days when the left set up the LSE, secure in the belief that a scientific and rational examination of economics would result in the vindication of socialism

   
At 1:02 AM, June 13, 2006, Anonymous MatGB said...

secure in the belief that a scientific and rational examination of economics would result in the vindication of socialism

It has. Just not State Socialism. Take away the capitol, and we're still good to go, we just need to push the tax/inheritance regime to encourage cooperatives and partnerships...

Also, naughty Andrew, you're not allowed to click your own links. You're also not supposed to propose others do do nor encourage them. You can get in trouble (as in, a friend of mine had his ads pulled for doing so).

But then, some of the ads are relevent, and useful, and given that the content on our sites is what interests us? I've bought stuff from ads on my site as well. So that makes up for the naughty clicking, right?

   

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£2,016.42 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £3.99 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe