Search:

Last 3 Posts @ July 6, 2008 7:47:44 PM EDT

Field of Women (43 mins ago)

Wendy and I met other Labour women councillors and Maria Eagle MP today at Liverpool Cricket Club to take part in the creation of a giant woman called LUCY, created by...

Louise Baldock

Spinning Survey Data (52 mins ago)

As a short follow up to my recent review of the TUC's interesting pamphlet on democratising public services, I took a look at the CBI's press release demanding the pac...

Union Futures

A Little More Detail would be nice.. (56 mins ago)

I've got in a bit of a scrap defending Jill Saward over at Libcon, although the discussion has led me to raise a point about one of the pro Liberty arguments currently be...

Citizen Andreas

Monday, December 19, 2005

End nears for Mac version of IE - no comments

If I can be allowed two techy posts in one day, the BBC say:
Microsoft has advised Mac users of Internet Explorer (IE) to switch to rival browsers such as Apple's Safari.

The advice came as the software giant formally announced the end of IE for Apple Macs.
Naturally many people are saying, "Thank god", but that's being a little unfair to Microsoft. The BBC seem to be quite happy to give the impression that the abomination known as IE 6 for Windows, the subject of endless whines from web developers, frustrated calls to Developer Support, and endless critical security patches, is the same beast as IE 5.2 for Mac, when, in fact, they couldn't be more different.

IE 5 for Mac appeared in 2000 which is, what, well over a year after IE 5 for Windows, and offered then-groundbreaking support for CSS and web standards, which put it well ahead of all rivals for probably 2 years, and helped kill off the decrepit Netscape Navigator. It continues to offer a unique, Mac-oriented user-interface (admittedly very much overtaken since Mac OS X's maturity), was developed by Microsoft's renowned team of Mac-lovers, offers features that no other browser has (Scrapbook, and Page Holder, to name just two), and is completely unlike its Windows counterpart in not having required security patches.

So, terribly dated, and deserving of the chop though it is, Mac users ought not to jump on its grave: curse Microsoft's pernicious influence on the Windows platform, not on the Mac OS.

Going back to the fairly feeble BBC article, there's this:
The only potential problem for Mac users could be with websites designed to work exclusively with IE.

In June, web-testing firm SciVisum surveyed 100 UK websites and found that one in 10 of them failed to work properly on the Firefox browser.
To be honest, I think this problem is exaggerated for Mac users. Though I spend most of my browsing time with blogs, I can't remember the last time I needed to use the copy of IE I have tucked away. Whereas on Windows, unprofessional web developers (and blinkered managers) occasonally perpetrate sites that only work on IE, this ignorance is normally felt by all Mac users, irrespective of their browser of choice.

no comments so far...

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£1,909.77 spent so far this year, which could be met by a donation of £3.77 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto


Wikispaces