Search:

Last 3 Posts @ August 8, 2008 3:14:45 PM EDT

God or evolution? (10 mins ago)

Justin Thacker, a doctor of theology, has been arguing over at Comment is Free why Richard Dawkins is an example of the argumentative overreach of many strident atheis...

Though Cowards Flinch

Rush: Snakes and Arrows (2007). In Praise of a Maligned Band. (19 mins ago)

It’s amazing how the mind works, how something banal can produce a fleeting thought, which then develops by a series of associations to lead you to re discover somethi...

Dermot

Sex, puppies and Mormonism (32 mins ago)

JOURNALISTS say that this is the perfect news headline: Sex-change priest in mercy dash to palace. Not entirely sure if it’s a fantasy headline sort of thin...

And another thing...

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Ashes in the mouth - no comments

Should have posted this earlier. Norm is running a competition for anyone brave enough to correctly predict the England / Australia Ashes series scoreline - he or she who getteth closest to the eventual scoreline gets signed copies of two of Norm's cricket books (or a prize of equivalent value, if such a thing were possible).

Anyway, you have until noon today to get your prediction in. Well, noon GMT, so is that 11 am BST? More details here,

You'll also need to predict the result of each of the 5 Tests. So, my prediction (if I remember rightly, as I left it on a postit at work) was:

England 2 - Australia 2: A, E, A, D, E

One participant, "DB", has been brave enough to go for a 4-1 Australia series victory. I really can't see anything like that happening:

5 results out of 5 seems a bit much to expect, given the strength of the batting on show and England's recent ability to pull draws (and sometimes wins) out of pretty iffy situations.

That being the case, I think Australia would have to play out of their skins - or many of England's stars would have to fail - for England to be beaten more than twice. Bell would have to turn into a Ramprakash, Harmison would have to become a Malcolm, Pietersen would have to be exposed in the longer-form (something I don't anticipate), or Flintoff injured (god forbid). That's not to say England will earn their 2-2 by performing as well, but I think it's a result they can achieve.

no comments so far...

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£2,016.43 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £3.99 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe