Search:

Last 3 Posts @ October 13, 2008 6:29:43 PM EDT

Awesome news (3 mins ago)

The government have agreed to shelve 42 days - thank Christ (or, more accurately, Liberty) for that. There is hope for the country yet. Also, big shout out to any Ma...

Grace Fletcher-Hackwood

Plagiarism by Proxy (13 mins ago)

It’s indicative of the utter bewilderment amongst Tories in the face of the current banking crisis that their attempts to spin thing to their political advantage...

Ministry of Truth

i like katie beaton's comics (14 mins ago)

Her website is here.

Assistant Blog

Thursday, May 26, 2005

The biggest ID fraud of them all? - 3 comments

The Register, characteristically (though, I fear, correctly) lays into the Government on the issue of ID cards.

The claim that ID theft costs the UK over £1.3 billion a year comes in for close scrutiny, and particular scorn:
So, of the numbers making up the "£1.3 billion" (actually £1.364 billion in the study), only that £35 million from the DWP could be said to bear some linkage to an ID card scheme, and the number itself is pretty much a guess...
They also make the point that figures that appear to show the general public backing the policy, in order to protect themselves from identity fraud, really highlight ignorance about the issues, of how people can be affected, and about what the ID cards can actually achieve, especially in an age of Internet purchasing.

I don't think anyone's suggesting that ID cards cannot work, but if it's the case that the level of success increases with the level of compulsion, it may well be that the level of success we demand can only be achieved with a level of compulsion/intrusion that we may not be at all comfortable with, or else would require enhancements (e.g. biometric readers at every ATM) that the current proposals don't allow for.

I haven't come across many people who support the policy having looked at it in any depth, but I'll keep my ear open for all contrary views - you know how to get in touch. In the meantime, I'll conclude this post by saying that I don't have the slightest faith in the Government's ability to deliver a robust and successful ID card platform, or a solution to the issue of identity fraud - at least not on the basis of what's being proposed now.

3 comments so far...

At 8:30 PM, May 26, 2005, Blogger Bishop Hill said...

Channel Four news reported a poll that they had conducted (online I think, with all the usual caveats about that) which was 80/20 against ID cards. A similar poll before the election had a narrow majority in favour.

   
At 9:30 PM, May 26, 2005, Blogger Scribbles said...

I just have an instinctive reaction against id cards. It’s the idea of it, of squashing fragments of humanity onto a bit of plastic. I am not a number.

Also, slight icky feeling that some big business thing will gorge themselves on this whilst doing a crap job.

   
At 9:56 PM, May 26, 2005, Blogger Bloggers4Labour said...

I wouldn't mind so much if the ID cards could be made useful to people in their daily lives, e.g. by swallowing up all the other cards we carry around and eliminating form-filling, but sadly none of this seems to be on the table.

My experience of software companies is that vast sums of money will be spent in City pubs, on expensive contractors, on unusable software, vast numbers of software licenses, and wasted because someone 'high up' decided they wanted things done differently halfway through the process and after all the people have been hired...

   

Post a Comment

<< Home

B4L Running Costs

£2,231.44 spent since 2007, which could be met by a donation of £4.41 per blogger.




Join the Labour Party
Sign the Euston Manifesto
We Are ZCTU: Defend unionists on trial in Zimbabwe